Blender 2.8 processor performance table

Buyer, this is a very important page for you!

This table and chart summarizes the results of our workstation testing. 

How is the testing done?

Very simple: on the assembled station, before giving it to the client, we start rendering the same scene (pavilion barcelona) in Blender 2.8, and the results of the image (1280*720) are recorded in our summary table in seconds.

In this way you and we can see the speed of work in a real application, and the shorter the calculation time - the more effective the workstation will show itself in this work.

Why is this necessary?

WE will help you choose the right workstation based on this data, and YOU can save some money).

The table and graphs allow you to compare processors among themselves, compare them with the power of your current computer, in general, do not buy a “cat in the bag”. The data in this table is collected over the years, updated and added, processors become more and more. This update added AMD Epyc processors, expanded Xeon E5 lineup and many new desktop processors.  

 

Data update dated 11/05/2024.

 

Processor  Render time
2х Epyc 7763 52
2х Epyc 7702 69
2х Epyc 7642 85
2х Xeon Platinum 8272CL 141
2х Xeon Platinum 8176 142
Threadripper 3970x 148
2х Epyc 7551 160
2х Xeon Gold P8136 162
2х Xeon Gold 6154 176
Threadripper 3960x 188
2х Xeon E5 2696v4 192
2х Xeon E5 2699v4 192
Ryzen 9 7950х 192
Core i9 13900KF 192
2х Xeon Gold 6148 199
2х Epyc 7282 206
2х Xeon E5 2673v4 219
4х Xeon E5 4657lv2 221
2х Xeon E5 2697v4 223
2х Xeon E5 2695v4 250
2х Xeon E5 2699v3 253
4х Xeon E5 4650v2 254
Ryzen 7 7900х 256
Core i7 13700KF 266
Ryzen 9 5950х 270
2х Xeon E5 2680v4 275
Ryzen 9 3950х 286
Core i9 12900KF 290
2х Xeon E5 2697v3 291
2х Xeon E5 2690v3 315
Xeon Gold 6154 320
4х Xeon E5 4650 323
Ryzen 9 5900x 326
Core i5 13600К 328
2х Xeon E5 2678v3 338
Core i7 12700K 353
2х Xeon E5 2666v3 365
Ryzen 7 7700x 370
Ryzen 9 3900x 371
Core i7 12700F 376
Xeon E5 2696v4 376
2х Xeon E5 2660v3 388
2х Xeon E5 2695v2 409
2х Xeon E5 2690v2 409
Core i9 10900KF 414
Xeon E5 2673v4 430
Core i9 10850KF 430
Core i5 12600К 445
Core i5 13400 457
2х Xeon E5 2670v2 465
Core i9 11900KF 475
Core i7 11700K 488
2х Xeon E5 2640v3 492
Core i7 11700F 513
Core i7 10700K 518
2х Xeon E5 2690  536
2х Xeon E5 2643v3 537
1х Xeon E5 2680v4 537
Core i9 9900KF 538
2х Xeon E5 2650v2 558
1х Xeon E5 2697v3  561
Threadripper 2970WX 562
Ryzen 7 3700x 563
2х Xeon E5 2670 586
Xeon w-2145 638
Ryzen 5 5600 640
Xeon E5 2680v3 658
Xeon E5 2678v3 660
Ryzen 5 5600X 669
Core i5 12400F 673
Core i9 11900F 686
Core i7 9700k 732
Core i7 9700k 782
Xeon E5 2660v3  793
Core i5 10400 880
Ryzen 5 2600x 901
E5 2670 v2 918
Ryzen 5 2600 935
Core i5 11400 948
Core i3 12100 972
2x Xeon X5675 976
2x Xeon X5670 1013
2х Xeon E5 2643 1049
Xeon E5 2690 1066
Xeon E5 1650v3 1084
Core i5 9400f 1156
2х Xeon E5649 1156
Xeon E5 2670 1165
2x Xeon X5677 1293
Xeon E5 1660 1325
Core i3 10100 1345
Xeon E5 1650 1366
Ryzen 5 3400G 1400
2x Xeon X5570 1432
Xeon E5 1620v3  1667
Core i3 9100f 1838
Xeon E5 2623 v4 1911
Xeon X5675 1943
Xeon E3 1245 2136
Ryzen 3 2200 2220
Xeon E5649 2399
Xeon X5677 2589
Pentium G6400 3484

 

 

Rendering time. The shorter the better

The second part, slower processors.