Blender 2.8 processor performance table
Buyer, this is a very important page for you!
This table and chart summarizes the results of our workstation testing.
How is the testing done?
Very simple: on the assembled station, before giving it to the client, we start rendering the same scene (pavilion barcelona) in Blender 2.8, and the results of the image (1280*720) are recorded in our summary table in seconds.
In this way you and we can see the speed of work in a real application, and the shorter the calculation time - the more effective the workstation will show itself in this work.
Why is this necessary?
WE will help you choose the right workstation based on this data, and YOU can save some money).
The table and graphs allow you to compare processors among themselves, compare them with the power of your current computer, in general, do not buy a “cat in the bag”. The data in this table is collected over the years, updated and added, processors become more and more. This update added AMD Epyc processors, expanded Xeon E5 lineup and many new desktop processors.
Data update dated 11/05/2024.
| Processor | Render time |
| 2х Epyc 7763 | 52 |
| 2х Epyc 7702 | 69 |
| 2х Epyc 7642 | 85 |
| 2х Xeon Platinum 8272CL | 141 |
| 2х Xeon Platinum 8176 | 142 |
| Threadripper 3970x | 148 |
| 2х Epyc 7551 | 160 |
| 2х Xeon Gold P8136 | 162 |
| 2х Xeon Gold 6154 | 176 |
| Threadripper 3960x | 188 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2696v4 | 192 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2699v4 | 192 |
| Ryzen 9 7950х | 192 |
| Core i9 13900KF | 192 |
| 2х Xeon Gold 6148 | 199 |
| 2х Epyc 7282 | 206 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2673v4 | 219 |
| 4х Xeon E5 4657lv2 | 221 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2697v4 | 223 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2695v4 | 250 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2699v3 | 253 |
| 4х Xeon E5 4650v2 | 254 |
| Ryzen 7 7900х | 256 |
| Core i7 13700KF | 266 |
| Ryzen 9 5950х | 270 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2680v4 | 275 |
| Ryzen 9 3950х | 286 |
| Core i9 12900KF | 290 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2697v3 | 291 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2690v3 | 315 |
| Xeon Gold 6154 | 320 |
| 4х Xeon E5 4650 | 323 |
| Ryzen 9 5900x | 326 |
| Core i5 13600К | 328 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2678v3 | 338 |
| Core i7 12700K | 353 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2666v3 | 365 |
| Ryzen 7 7700x | 370 |
| Ryzen 9 3900x | 371 |
| Core i7 12700F | 376 |
| Xeon E5 2696v4 | 376 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2660v3 | 388 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2695v2 | 409 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2690v2 | 409 |
| Core i9 10900KF | 414 |
| Xeon E5 2673v4 | 430 |
| Core i9 10850KF | 430 |
| Core i5 12600К | 445 |
| Core i5 13400 | 457 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2670v2 | 465 |
| Core i9 11900KF | 475 |
| Core i7 11700K | 488 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2640v3 | 492 |
| Core i7 11700F | 513 |
| Core i7 10700K | 518 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2690 | 536 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2643v3 | 537 |
| 1х Xeon E5 2680v4 | 537 |
| Core i9 9900KF | 538 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2650v2 | 558 |
| 1х Xeon E5 2697v3 | 561 |
| Threadripper 2970WX | 562 |
| Ryzen 7 3700x | 563 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2670 | 586 |
| Xeon w-2145 | 638 |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | 640 |
| Xeon E5 2680v3 | 658 |
| Xeon E5 2678v3 | 660 |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | 669 |
| Core i5 12400F | 673 |
| Core i9 11900F | 686 |
| Core i7 9700k | 732 |
| Core i7 9700k | 782 |
| Xeon E5 2660v3 | 793 |
| Core i5 10400 | 880 |
| Ryzen 5 2600x | 901 |
| E5 2670 v2 | 918 |
| Ryzen 5 2600 | 935 |
| Core i5 11400 | 948 |
| Core i3 12100 | 972 |
| 2x Xeon X5675 | 976 |
| 2x Xeon X5670 | 1013 |
| 2х Xeon E5 2643 | 1049 |
| Xeon E5 2690 | 1066 |
| Xeon E5 1650v3 | 1084 |
| Core i5 9400f | 1156 |
| 2х Xeon E5649 | 1156 |
| Xeon E5 2670 | 1165 |
| 2x Xeon X5677 | 1293 |
| Xeon E5 1660 | 1325 |
| Core i3 10100 | 1345 |
| Xeon E5 1650 | 1366 |
| Ryzen 5 3400G | 1400 |
| 2x Xeon X5570 | 1432 |
| Xeon E5 1620v3 | 1667 |
| Core i3 9100f | 1838 |
| Xeon E5 2623 v4 | 1911 |
| Xeon X5675 | 1943 |
| Xeon E3 1245 | 2136 |
| Ryzen 3 2200 | 2220 |
| Xeon E5649 | 2399 |
| Xeon X5677 | 2589 |
| Pentium G6400 | 3484 |
Rendering time. The shorter the better
The second part, slower processors.
